Title:

Kind
Code:

A1

Abstract:

The present invention provides a Lease/Rent Optimizer (LRO) for helping property management companies to forecast and analyze market demand and unit availability, as well as to set leasing agreements based on dynamically measured consumer demand. The LRO takes into account customer preferences, market conditions, and competitive behavior. The system optimally applies user-defined business rules to provide market-specific flexibility in combining base rents and concessions to consumers. By forecasting demand for different unit types and lease terms, then using those forecasts to ensure that inventory is optimally positioned to satisfy demand, the LRO is designed to enhance overall revenue contribution from new and renewing leases. Conversely, these features benefit customers by helping them find the unit types and lease terms they need when they need them by better matching rental unit supplies to demand. The LRO provides sophisticated decision support so that property managers can look beyond comparatively static rules of thumb and past experience to set rental rates. Even when management recognizes the need for repricing, the establishing of new prices involves another application of static rules and gut feel that can result in too little or too much change.

Inventors:

Walker, Thomas M. (Fayetteville, GA, US)

Davidoff, Donald (Fayetteville, GA, US)

Kuyumeu, Ahmet (Smyrna, GA, US)

Pyron, Nancy (Smyrna, GA, US)

Horak, Jeff (Woodstock, GA, US)

Davidoff, Donald (Fayetteville, GA, US)

Kuyumeu, Ahmet (Smyrna, GA, US)

Pyron, Nancy (Smyrna, GA, US)

Horak, Jeff (Woodstock, GA, US)

Application Number:

09/984642

Publication Date:

05/29/2003

Filing Date:

10/30/2001

Export Citation:

Assignee:

Manugistics Atlanta, Inc.

Primary Class:

International Classes:

View Patent Images:

Related US Applications:

Primary Examiner:

SHRESTHA, BIJENDRA K

Attorney, Agent or Firm:

Mayer Brown LLP (Chicago, IL, US)

Claims:

1. A method for recommending a rent for a lease, the method comprising the steps of: organizing the lease by its a revenue management (RM) product; gathering historical data for that RM product; forecasting demand for the RM product using said historical data; forecasting supply for the RM product using said historical data; estimating demand elasticity for the RM product using historical said data; and identifying an optimizing rent using said forecasted demand, said forecasted supply, and said estimated demand elasticity.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein said factors in said RM product include a time period, a lease type, a market segment, a lease term category, and a unit category.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein said lease type is either new or renewal.

4. The method of claim 2, wherein said lease term is either short, medium, or long.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein a user designates a time interval during which said historical data is collected.

6. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of updating the historical data to include new data.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein said updating uses a weighted moving average.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the updating uses a leave-out-one method to choose said weights.

9. The method of claim 6, wherein said updating uses an error term.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein said error term is a mean-squared error or a mean-average error.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein said step of gathering historical data further includes unconstraining said historical data.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein said step of gathering historical data further includes: determining a seasonality factor, and adjusting said historical data by said seasonality factor.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein said step of forecasting demand includes forecasting new lease demand.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein said step of forecasting demand includes forecasting renewal lease demand.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein said renewal lease demand is estimated using a number of times the lease will expire within a time period.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein said demand forecasting produces a range having a maximum forecasted demand and a minimum forecasted demand.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein supply forecasting includes forecasting the number of early terminations.

18. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of computing a reference rent corresponding to a perceived value for a unit associated with the lease.

19. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of: collecting competitor data; and adjusting forecasted supply and demand for said competitor data.

20. The method of claim 1, wherein estimating demand elasticity uses an average rent, an average demand, a variance of rent, and a variance of demand.

21. The method of claim 1, wherein the optimized rent is identified includes: forming a revenue function for said lease using said forecasted demand, forecasted supply, and said estimated demand elasticity; and finding a maximum value for said revenue function.

22. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of using the demand forecast and the estimated demand elasticity to estimate demand at the optimal rent.

23. The method of claim 22 further comprising the step constraining the estimated demand at the optimal rent.

24. The method of claim 23 wherein said optimum rent is adjusted for the constrained demand.

25. A system for optimizing a rent for a unit over a time period, the system comprising: a data pooling module for collecting information on the unit and related units; a demand forecaster for the unit and related units over the time period; a supply forecaster for the unit and related units over the time period; a demand elasticity module for the unit and related units over the time period; and an optimization module using the demand forecaster, the supply forecaster and the demand elasticity module for determining the optimal rent of the unit over the time period.

26. The system of claim 25 further comprising a statistical update module for modifying the data pooling module with new data.

27. The system of claim 25 further comprising a competitive information module for modifying the demand forecaster, the supply forecaster, and the demand elasticity module using competitor data.

28. The system of claim 25 further comprising a constrained demand forecaster for estimating constrained demand at the optimal rent produced by the optimizer module.

29. The system of claim 28 further comprising a recommendation module for modifying the optimal rent in view of the estimated constrained demand.

30. A system for optimizing a rent for a lease, the system comprising: a means for collecting information; a means for demand forecasting; a means for supply forecasting; a means for estimating demand elasticity; and a means for using the demand forecast, the supply forecast and the estimated demand elasticity to determine the optimal rent.

Description:

[0001] This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application Serial No. 60/244,271, filed Oct. 30, 2000, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

[0002] The present invention generally relates to a lease management system that collects and processes data related to multi-family housing units, such as apartment complexes and communities, and then uses this data to provide recommendations for revenue maximizing rents.

[0003] A primary challenge for a property management company is to maximize revenues from new and renewal leases. Under pressure to increase revenues from operations, property management companies face extremely complex issues of pricing and capacity allocation. Multi-family units are large fixed assets whose single greatest liability is vacancy cost. Units must not be allowed to run vacant if suitable demand for them exists, but attempting to maximize revenue means more than maximizing occupancy. In fact, a property manager's products are not units, but rather a combination of timing and a balancing of supply and demand. Successfully meeting this complex pricing challenge is simplified by decision-support tools that apply differential pricing strategies and the smart allocation of capacity.

[0004] To maximize revenues, the property manager needs to precisely forecast and analyze market demand and unit availability. Likewise, the property manager needs to set lease prices based on measuring dynamic consumer demand. To achieve these goals, the property manager should calculate the economic value of each unit type in the marketplace and determine the optimal effective base rents as well as rents for move-ins and renewals. The property manager also preferably forecasts rental demand during different time periods, as well as regularly re-optimizes rents in response to changing demand, availability, and market conditions. Moreover, a property manager needs to perform these tasks each day, every day, while continuing to effectively serve customers. In addition, a property management company generally desires to institutionalize market knowledge in order to become less dependent on individual managers' skills.

[0005] Therefore, there is a need for a system and method to allow property management companies to match rental supply and demand to enhance revenue and better satisfy customers.

[0006] In response to this and other needs, the present invention provides a Lease/Rent Optimizer (LRO) for helping property management companies to forecast and analyze market demand and unit availability, as well as to set leasing agreements based on dynamically measured consumer demand. The LRO takes into account customer preferences, market conditions, and competitive behavior. The system optimally applies user-defined business rules to provide market-specific flexibility in combining base rents and concessions to consumers. By forecasting demand for different unit types and lease terms, then using those forecasts to ensure that inventory is optimally positioned to satisfy demand, the LRO is designed to enhance overall revenue contribution from new and renewing leases. Conversely, these features benefit customers by helping them find the unit types and lease terms they need when they need them by better matching rental unit supplies to demand.

[0007] The LRO provides sophisticated decision support so that property managers can look beyond comparatively static rules of thumb and past experience to set rental rates. Even when management recognizes the need for repricing, the establishing of new prices involves another application of static rules and gut feel that can result in too little or too much change. The LRO helps the user eliminate such guesswork by forming and updating up-to-the-minute statistics and historical observations that may be used to forecast a picture of future supply and demand conditions. The competitive information process calculates the economic value of each unit category in the marketplace, and its pricing calculations estimate the magnitude of change in demand that will result from any specific changes in rents. The LRO then recommends optimal rents for each unit type and lease term, for both new leases and renewals, helping to deliver enhanced revenue.

[0008] Overall, the LRO directly addresses the question of what a property management company should charge for products in order to help capture more revenue. Specifically, the LRO uses the power of computers to systematize the forecasting process, helping to prevent other pressing management concerns from delaying or preventing this crucial function. The LRO dynamically adjusts to changing market conditions and makes explicit, optimal pricing recommendations by unit type and lease term to help a property management company to translate supply and demand data clearly into action. The LRO also embeds a disciplined process for enhancing revenues in a property management company to leverage the skill and experience of property managers, even if those managers leave the property management company.

[0009] The LRO sets lease rates to help increase revenue by responding to forecasted future supply and demand conditions, not past conditions. The LRO further addresses current competitor actions according to the forecasted impact of these actions on supply and demand. The LRO also addresses vacancy costs and provides intelligence about supply, demand, and pricing throughout the organization.

[0010] The optimization of rents and lease terms helps enable increases in top-line revenues and satisfies market demand. At the same time, decision support and management reporting improves the property management operations. Also, the LRO has a flexible configuration that accommodates different community types and market conditions while daily re-forecasting and optimization allow the LRO to adapt quickly to changing market conditions.

[0011] In one embodiment, the LRO also includes a web-enabled user interface to allow convenient accessibility and positioning via the Internet or other distributed network. This embodiment further allows for the automated collection of rental data through the use of data mining techniques such as programmed searchers.

[0012] A more complete understanding of the present invention and advantages thereof may be acquired by referring to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numbers indicate like features, and wherein:

[0013]

[0014]

[0015] FIGS.

[0016] As generally illustrated in

[0017] Returning to

[0018] a Data Pooling Processing Module

[0019] a Business Statistics Update Module

[0020] a Demand Forecaster

[0021] a Supply Forecaster

[0022] a Competitive Information Module

[0023] a Demand Elasticity Module

[0024] an Optimization Module

[0025] a Constrained Demand Forecasting Module

[0026] a Recommendation Module

[0027] In the LRO

[0028] Acronymns

[0029] The following are acronyms used in this document:

CP | Competitor | |

CV | Coefficient of Variation | |

DL | Days Left | |

EP | Epoch Point | |

GPU | Guests Per Unit | |

LNR | Lease Type N or R | |

LT | Lease Term | |

LTC | Lease Term Category | |

MAE | Mean Absolute Error | |

MSE | Mean Squared Error | |

MIW | Move-in Week | |

MOW | Move-out Week | |

NM | Number of Months | |

MT | Month Type (i.e., Jan, Feb, etc.) | |

MS | Market Segment | |

N | New Market Segment | |

R | Renewal Market Segment | |

RM | Revenue Management | |

UC | Unit Category | |

WK | Week | |

WT | Week Type (B: Beginning, M: Middle, E: End) | |

[0030] Data Types

[0031] The LRO

[0032] Every transaction may be bucketed into a RM product

[0033] 1) Week

[0034] 2) Lease Type

[0035] 3) Market Segment

[0036] 4) Lease Term Category

[0037] 5) Unit Category

[0038] While the system

[0039] Week

[0040] There are generally two lease types

[0041] The lease term

[0042] Unit Categories (UC)

[0043] Data Pooling Component

[0044] Returning to

[0045] Week type is one of the main keys by which Business Statistics are maintained. Since move-in and move-out activities significantly differ in each week of the month, the LRO

[0046] In one embodiment, a week starts on Monday and ends on Sunday. Week Type is identified by where its Saturday falls with respect to the month as: Week Type B (for Beginning) if the week includes the first Saturday of the month; Week Type E (for End) if the week includes the last Saturday of the month; and Week Type M (for Middle) otherwise. While this disclosure describes the use of weeks as the temporal period for records, it should be appreciated that other time units such as months, seasons, or years may be used without significant departure from the present invention.

[0047] In another embodiment, epoch points corresponds to the number of days before the Sunday (or endday) of the move-in week. They are used to construct lead time curves. The set of epoch points are dynamically determined based on the shape of the curve.

[0048] Business Statistics Update Module

[0049] The Business Statistic Update Module (BSUM)

[0050] The BSUM

[0051] Preferably, the updating of each Business Statistic is based on Weighted Moving Average method step _{t}_{t}_{t }_{t}_{t}_{t}

[0052] where

[0053] and h=0 is assumed to be the next time period. The weight a_{ht }

[0054] BSUM

[0055] Let h=0,1, . . . ,H be the time periods for which LRO _{3 }_{ht }_{ht }

[0056] where 0<α<1. It is noted that as α→1,

[0057] when h=0; otherwise,

[0058] which is equivalent to the conventional moving average method. It is noted that if h=0, then LRO

[0059] To optimize weights by the Leave-Out-One method, the BSUM

[0060] It is noted that LRO

[0061] Unconstraining is executed for new Lease Type N, step

[0062] In one embodiment of BSUM

[0063] where Guest Card Factor is a user-specified backend parameter; a regression equation is used to obtain Number of Guest Cards at Occupancy=x %; and the denominator in the second term pertains to actual occupancy.

[0064] In an optimal embodiment, the BSUM

[0065] Seasonality refers to identical or almost identical patterns that demand appears to follow during corresponding weeks of successive years. Seasonality parameters provide an estimate of proportional, periodic deviations of demand from the underlying average demand. The LRO

[0066] Final observations are inputted to the seasonality module. Seasonal factors are computed using a linear regression model, which assumes that the seasonal components are not changing year to year. The model uses a collection of dummy or indicator variables, each of which has only two allowable values, 0 or 1. A variable may correspond to a month, a week type, or a special event week. Seasonal factors, trend, and special event factors are computed simultaneously from the regression model.

[0067] The observed unconstrained demand is inputted to Demand Average computation. Observed Demand is then adjusted for seasonal variation and often referred as deseasonalized demand. Demand Average is about the size estimate of the demand. Demand Average is computed at the lowest pooling level and for the historical time period H that the user identifies in step

[0068] where Y_{t }_{t }

[0069] The BSUM

[0070] where weight a_{0t }_{t}^{′}

[0071] The degree to which historical demand tends to spread about its average is called “variance of demand.” This statistic measures if the data is tightly bunched together or spread across a wide range. In other words, variance is about the dispersion estimate of the demand. To determine the variance of demand, the BSUM

[0072] where weights a_{0t}^{′}

[0073] Rent Average is computed using monthly rents. It is used in Competitive Information Module

[0074] The update module _{1 }_{t }

[0075] where weights a_{0t }

[0076] The degree to which rents tend to spread about its average is called “variance of weekly revenue.” This statistic measures if the rent is tightly bunched together or spread across a wide range. Ignoring Special Event weeks, the update module _{y }

[0077] where weights a_{0t}^{″}

[0078] Lead time curves characterize arrival pattern by days left for Lease Type N. In other words, a lead time curve contains estimates of the fraction of total demand in new leases in the market segment that will be observed during various days. This statistic is about the shape estimate of demand across days, but not about the size estimate of the demand. The size and shape of the demand are estimated separately since they demonstrate different levels of stability. Generally, the demand fraction may be found using equation 13.

[0079] where i represents an epoch point, and DL=WK(Sunday)−Capture Date. If a special event has occurred during the time period of interest, the update module applies a straight moving average of the past two or more years, subject to data availability.

[0080] Another variable managed by the update module

[0081] For LNR=N,

[0082] and for or LNR=R,

[0083] The update module

[0084] For LNR=N,

[0085] and for LNR=R,

[0086] where summation is over Lease Terms in the corresponding Lease Term Category and a weighted moving average method is applied.

[0087] An Early Termination Average represents total number of early termination counts, which are derived by incrementing the early terminations for each of the affected weeks (done at the aggregation). This statistic is based on the size estimate of early termination and focuses on the final (DL=0) early termination count. The LRO

[0088] while applying the weighted moving average method.

[0089] An average number of vacant days is derived from the difference between move-in and move-out dates of two consecutive leases. It is used to estimate expected vacancy cost, which is input to the optimization model. For every WK and Unit Category, the update module

[0090] where i represents observations (indexed to the new leases), and denominator represents total number of new leases.

[0091] “Renewal Fraction Seasonality” refers to identical or almost identical patterns that renewals appear to follow during corresponding weeks of successive years. Seasonality parameters provide estimate of proportional, periodic deviations of renewal fractions from the underlying average renewal fraction. The LRO

[0092] Final observations of renewal fractions are inputted to this module. Seasonal factors are computed using linear regression model similar to the one used to estimate Demand Seasonality factors. The model utilizes a collection of dummy or indicator variables, each of which has only two allowable values, 0 or 1. A variable may correspond to a month, a week type, or a special event. The update module

[0093] The first term in equation 18 represents levels for the omitted Month and Week Type A month, and a week type (December and Week Type E) is omitted to avoid problem of multicollinearity (which is arbitrarily chosen to be December and Week Type E, this week is regarded as “base week.” “Base week” is the period for which all indicator variables have value zero. If some other period were chosen as the base week, the regression values would look different but still tell the same story. The second term is for a Trend component. The third summation term is for the 11 months, X_{1 }_{2 }

[0094] The update module

_{0}_{MT}_{WT}

[0095] where â_{0}_{MT}_{WT }

[0096] Another statistic maintained by the update module

[0097] Another variable maintained by the update module

[0098] The LRO

[0099] To use equation 22, the update module

[0100] Demand Forecasting Module

[0101] The Demand Forecasting Module (DFM)

[0102] The DFM

[0103] All forecasts are floating point numbers.

[0104] Unconstrained demand is defined to be the total number of move-ins at the Reference Rent if there were sufficient units for all of them. As explained below, the LRO

[0105] Unconstrained demand forecast for Lease Type N is computed using Week, Unit Category, Lease Term Category, and Market Segment data. The forecaster for Lease Type N look to unconstrained deseasonalized demand, which includes denials and regrets, and excludes: (a) cancellations, (b) seasonality parameters, (c) trend parameters, (d) special event factor, (e) lead time curves (including special event lead time curves when applicable), and (f) lease term fractions. The DFM

[0106] The DFM

[0107] It is noted that this is executed for Lease Type N only.

[0108] The DFM

[0109] where Remaining Forecast of Expiring Leases is derived from Unconstrained Remaining Demand Forecast for new leases using equation 26.

[0110] It is noted that t=1 represents the next forecast period (week), and WK represents the week for which LRO would like to estimate number of expiring leases. An integer index is used (i.e., number of weeks from today) in the summation for WK. In addition, AveLT represents average lease term statistics in which WT is indexed to the t (not WK). Also, a denotes the smallest integer number greater than or equal to a.

[0111] Factors considered by the DFM

[0112] Subsequently, the LRO may compute Remaining Demand by existing LTC as:

[0113] Furthermore, the LRO can aggregate over existing LTC using equation 29.

[0114] The user may override of forecast if desired and no decaying applies. The DFM

[0115] The DFM

[0116] The demand forecaster

[0117] The demand forecaster

[0118] In one embodiment of DFM

[0119] Supply Forecasting Module

[0120] The optimization process uses a forecast of the remaining number of available units produced by the supply forecasting module (SFM)

[0121] It is noted that available Units are adjusted for Early Termination, which is the forecasted component of the supply. Early Termination Adjustment depends on the days left (Dl) to the end of the week. Days left is defined by the difference between End Date (i.e., Sunday) of the move-in week and current date.

[0122] Early Termination Adjustment, step

[0123] For each WK, UC:

[0124] Optimizable Capacity is an input to the capacity constraints in the optimization model. Available Capacity by unit type is also needed for Action Index computation.

[0125] The optimization process described below, uses a Optimizable Rent (Reference Rent minus property preparation and vacancy costs) as an input to produce optimal rents. The Competitive Information Module (CIM)

[0126] Reference Rent pertains to “economic value” or perceived value of a unit in the marketplace. In general, the value of a product can be defined as the utility gained from it. It is assumed that customers compare Reference Rent to the offered rent of a unit. The LRO

[0127] The SFM

[0128] The SFM

[0129] The SFM

[0130] Also, the supply forecasting computes Market Reference Rent by Lease Type and Market Segment according to equation 36:

[0131] where Market Reference Rent (UT, LTC) is obtained above in equation 35, and MSDifference(UT,LNR, MS) represents market segment difference, which is a backend parameter.

[0132] The SFM

[0133] This Reference Rent value is then used in Recommendations module

[0134] The SFM

[0135] It is noted that early termination adjustment is disregarded in equation 38.

[0136] The SFM

[0137] The SFM

[0138] The SFM

[0139] This Reference Rent value may be stored, for instance, in a database. While Reference Rent is not directly used the system, but the Reference Rent is a central quantity that LRO should be able to access.

[0140] The SFM

[0141] The SFM

[0142] The SFM

[0143] If LNR=R, the Total Monthly Cost is defined by equation 45:

[0144] Total Monthly Cost is used in the Recommendation module

[0145] The SFM

[0146] Optimizable Rent is an important statistic because it is one of the main inputs to the optimization in the optimization module

[0147] Competitive Information Module

[0148] The competitive information module (CIM)

[0149] Demand Elasticity Estimator

[0150] The demand elasticity estimator (DEE)

[0151] An elasticity (β) model is defined to be

[0152] where Y represents demand, R represents price (or rent), ΔY and ΔR denote differences in demand and price, respectively, and it is assumed that elasticity parameter β is constant for all rent R>0 and quantity Y>0.

[0153] In a preferred embodiment of the DEE

[0154] 1. A set of demand elasticity values (initially three of them) is pre-specified for each lease type. The final number used for each combination will be one of these values. This should be backend parameter.

[0155] 2. Demand Elasticity is computed for each Week, Unit Category, Lease Term Category, Lease Type, and Market Segment;

[0156] 3. Demand elasticity is assumed to be a function of historical variances of the price and demand. Specifically, the DEE

[0157] The process used by the DEE

[0158] for each WK, UC, LTC, LNR=R. and MS as follows:

[0159] where, n is total expiring leases, p is a deseasonalized Renewal Fraction as described above, and

[0160] The DEE

[0161] Rent Average R, and Rent Variance

[0162] which all are computed at WT, UC, LTC, and MS.

[0163] Demand elasticity value is then estimated as a function of historical variances of the rent and demand using equation 48, step

[0164] where {overscore (Y)}, s_{{overscore (Y)}}_{{overscore (R)}}

[0165] if β<a, then β=β_{1′}

[0166] if β≧a and β≦b, then β=β_{2 }

[0167] else β=β_{3 }

[0168] where a, b, β_{1}_{2 }_{3 }_{1}_{2 }_{3 }

[0169] Optimization Module

[0170] The optimization module (OM)

[0171] The optimization model is a concave quadratic maximization problem in which all constraints are linear. The method consists of simulating a sequence of realizations of demand between prediction intervals and solving the deterministic quadratic programming model. The optimal prices from this sequence is then averaged to form optimal price recommendations.

[0172] The application first introduce the notational indices used in defining the Decision variables

[0173] Decision variables in the optimization module

[0174] Q_{tcjni }

[0175] P_{tcjni }

[0176] P_{tcjni }_{tcjni}

[0177] Parameters for Optimize module

[0178] P_{tcjni}^{R }

[0179] Q_{tcjni}^{R }

[0180] R_{tcjni }

[0181] β_{tcjni }

[0182] C_{tc }

[0183] C_{tc}^{′}

[0184] where 1≦d≦t. In addition, Average Lease Term Statistic is computed from the week type of week d. MinMonth(j) is equal to minimum number of months for a given lease term category. It is noted that minimum number of months for the shortest lease term category should be 1. That is why the term is always equal to 1 in case minimum month for the shortest lease term category is defined as 0.

[0185] Furthermore,

[0186] and J is the maximum number of lease term categories.

[0187] The relationship between Demand and Price may be assumed to be linear. Specifically, LRO may use

^{R}^{R}

[0188] where

[0189] P=price

[0190] β=elasticity parameter (β<0)

[0191] Q=demand

[0192] Q^{R}

[0193] P^{R}

[0194] In addition, LRO may assume that an upper price, P^{U}

^{U}^{R}^{R}

[0195] where P^{U}^{R }^{L}^{R}^{U }

[0196] If LRO sets P=P^{L}^{U }

[0197] where β, Q^{R}^{R}^{L }

[0198] If Q is an independent variable.

^{R}^{R}

[0199] which can be rewritten as

^{2}^{R}^{R}

[0200] Accordingly, the second derivative is

[0201] and for β<0, revenue function is concave.

[0202] Thus, OM

[0203] The solution algorithm formed in step

[0204] solves equations 56-58 using Q^{R}_{tcjni }

[0205] where k represents k^{th }_{tcjni }

[0206] The optimizer repeatedly increments k until K>N, where N is the system parameter specifying number of iterations in the simulation. For every new k value and for each combination of WK, UC, LTC, LNR and MS, the OM ^{R }^{R }

[0207] The OM _{tcjni }_{ce }_{tcjni }

[0208] {overscore (P*)}_{tcjni }

[0209] Constrained Demand Forecasting Module

[0210] The constrained demand forecasting module (CDFM) ^{R }_{tcjni}_{tcjni}

[0211] and all constrained forecasts are preferably converted to integers and reconciled to ensure that they balance.

[0212] Recommendation Module

[0213] The recommendation module (RM)

[0214] In the CIM

[0215] The optimization produces recommendations at WK, UC, LTC, LNR, and MS level. This is converted into WK, UT, LTC, LNR, and MS level by using relationships among Current Base Effective Rents. Further, recommendations are converted into WK, UT, LT, LNR, and MS level using the relationships among the expected number of empty units for each week that falls into the corresponding lease term category.

[0216] The recommendation module first computes Current Base Effective Rent using equation 63.

[0217] The recommendation module

[0218] where UT belongs to UC and Σl denotes number of UTs within a given UC.

[0219] The RM

[0220] where Remaining Constrained Forecast (WK, UC, LNR, MS) is found with the Constrained Demand Forecasting module

[0221] The recommendation module

[0222] The recommendation module

[0223] The recommendation module

[0224] where

[0225] denotes the number of LT within LTC.

[0226] The recommendation module

[0227] The recommendation module

[0228] All optimal rents are checked against current rents by each WK, UT, LT, LNR and MS. Only those that differ are identified as new recommendations. If an optimum rent differs from the current rent for each combination by a Rent Threshold (this has a min and max by WK), the recommendations are created. Rent Threshold is specified by the user and can be percentage or dollar amount.

[0229] In one embodiment, the LRO

[0230] In another embodiment, the user influences on forecast and optimum rent. In particular, the user is allowed to make adjustments to the forecast and optimal rents.

[0231] The foregoing description of the preferred embodiments of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. For instance, the method of the present invention may be modified as needed to incorporate new communication networks and protocols as they are developed. It is intended that the scope of the invention be limited not by this detailed description, but rather by the claims appended hereto. The above specification, examples and data provide a complete description of the manufacture and use of the composition of the invention. Since many embodiments of the invention can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, the invention resides in the claims hereinafter appended.